We've been seeing some debate lately around whether vendor consolidation actually increases risk. And we get it. If you’re consolidating on paper but still relying on subcontractors and third-party support, you’re not really simplifying anything. You’re just making it look neater on a spreadsheet.
So let’s clear the air:
At its core, vendor consolidation means working with fewer vendors to manage a specific part of your organization to reduce complexity, increase accountability, and cut down on overlapping contracts and finger-pointing.
But here’s the real question: Why would you have four different vendors managing printers, label printers, scanners, and fax lines? They’re all part of the same I/O layer. So why manage them separately?
Done right, vendor consolidation simplifies everything:
The key is knowing what you’re consolidating to, not just what you’re reducing.
Here’s where it gets risky:
This happens more often than you'd think. And in environments like healthcare, it can be a major liability.
Vendor consolidation isn’t automatically a good or bad thing. It’s a strategy. And like any strategy, its success depends on how it’s executed.
If you’re thinking about consolidating, ask:
At Techio, we take ownership of the I/O layer—printers, scanners, labelers, faxes, everything in between, consolidating your operations, outcomes, and risk.
That means:
Ready to consolidate the right way? Schedule a meeting with Techio.